Aiming Arrows...in the hands of a warrior
deanmay
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit deanmay's Xanga Site!

Name: Dean


Interests: destroying cherished myths
Expertise: harnessing the power of rhetoric


Message: message me


Member Since: 8/13/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
wisc_fusion
daveyperson
pudahdudah
wedgewouldplaysoccer
SusanLaNelle
i_am_golden19
TammyMay
xc_longjump4life
JustinRachel
Mountford_and_Mackville
kwanza_jones
JaredBenDean
Yechezqel
EthanByUntitled

Blogrings
Fusion Soccer
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Monday, September 15, 2008

From American View: http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1154&PHPSESSID=1859189ca760fd6b7d1c43e6498be14d

The following Q & As were reported in “Anchorage Daily News” (10/22/06) when Sarah Palin was running for Governor.

6) If Roe v. Wade were overturned and states could once again prohibit abortion, in your view, to what extent should abortion be prohibited in Alaska?

Under this hypothetical scenario, it would not be up to the governor to unilaterally ban anything. It would be up to the people of Alaska to discuss and decide how we would like our society to reflect our values.

7) Do you support or oppose the use of public funds for abortion (e.g., paying for abortion, promoting abortion, subsidizing organizations that provide or refer for abortion)?

I oppose the use of public funds for elective abortions.

Note: The word “elective” inserted in her final answer indicates she most likely would be for “public funds” to pay for “poor” women who “had to have” abortions but could not afford to pay for murdering their babies. Just a guess, but probably her position. — J.L.


Sunday, December 02, 2007

Think about this

Random quote from my 8 year old this morning while he was unloading the dishwasher:

"I think it's really amazing that Mary got to kiss the face of God."


Saturday, November 03, 2007

Ron Paul



Thursday, October 04, 2007

It is interesting to me that the ways people witness today don’t seem to match up with what happened in the early church. Today the primary focus is the avoidance of hell and the gain of heaven. The opening question is often, “if you died tonight would you be in heaven or hell?”  Let’s take a cursory look at the inducements or benefits given for conversion in the book of Acts.

Acts 2:38-39:  Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."

The inducements given are forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, the same gift that the hearers were witnessing being poured out on the upper room. This alter call followed the amazing miracle of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the appearance of flaming tongues of fire and the ensuing of everyone speaking in foreign tongues unknown to them, praising God (the tongues were not being used to preach the gospel as many erroneously preach). Peter tells the crowd, repent, and they can have the same thing- not only them, but all who are far off. That would be us.

Acts 3: 16, 19-20, 26  It is Jesus' name and the faith that comes through him that has given this complete healing to him, as you can all see… Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, and that he may send the Christ, who has been appointed for you--even Jesus… When God raised up his servant, he sent him first to you to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked ways.

Inducements: Healing, forgiveness of sins, times of refreshing, blessing

Acts 4:12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.

Inducement: Salvation. Now most evangelicals reads this verse and automatically narrowly define this to mean getting to heaven when you die. But that isn’t what the text says, nor does the context hint that is the meaning. In fact, the context (see other quoted verses) indicates it is speaking more about a salvation that occurs in this present life.

Acts 5: 19-20  But during the night an angel of the Lord opened the doors of the jail and brought them out. "Go, stand in the temple courts," he said, "and tell the people the full message of this new life."

This is the angel speaking to some of the apostles who had been thrown in jail. The angel is telling them what the content of their evangelical message should be: tell the people the FULL message of this new LIFE. Surprisingly absent (or at least to most evangelicals) from this condensed gospel message is any mention of heaven or hell.

Acts 5: 31  God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Savior that he might give repentance and forgiveness of sins to Israel. We are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey him.

Inducements: Repentance, forgiveness of sins.

Acts 5:15-16  As a result, people brought the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats so that at least Peter's shadow might fall on some of them as he passed by.  Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by evil spirits, and all of them were healed.

Inducements: healing, deliverance.

Acts 5:42  Day after day, in the temple courts and from house to house, they never stopped teaching and proclaiming the good news that Jesus is the Christ.

Here is an unusual (by today’s standards) inducement: Jesus is the Christ.

Acts 6: 8  Now Stephen, a man full of God's grace and power, did great wonders and miraculous signs among the people.

Inducements: great wonders and miraculous signs.

Acts 8: 6-8  When the crowds heard Philip and saw the miraculous signs he did, they all paid close attention to what he said. With shrieks, evil spirits came out of many, and many paralytics and cripples were healed. So there was great joy in that city.

Inducements: miraculous signs, deliverance, healings, and great joy.

Acts 8:13b  And he followed Philip everywhere, astonished by the great signs and miracles he saw.

Inducements: great signs and miracles.

Acts 8:35  Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.

Inducements: good news about Jesus.

Acts 9: 34  "Aeneas," Peter said to him, "Jesus Christ heals you. Get up and take care of your mat." Immediately Aeneas got up. All those who lived in Lydda and Sharon saw him and turned to the Lord.

Inducements: healing.

Acts 9: 37  About that time she became sick and died … Peter sent them all out of the room; then he got down on his knees and prayed. Turning toward the dead woman, he said, "Tabitha, get up." She opened her eyes, and seeing Peter she sat up…  This became known all over Joppa, and many people believed in the Lord.

Inducements: resurrection from the dead.

Acts 10: 36-43  You know the message God sent to the people of Israel, telling the good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all… He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one whom God appointed as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.

Inducements: peace, Jesus is our judge, forgiveness of sins.

Acts 10: 44  While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message…for they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God.

Inducements: speaking in tongues to praise God.

Acts 11: 20  Some of them… went to Antioch and began to speak to Greeks also, telling them the good news about the Lord Jesus.

Inducements: Jesus is Lord is good news.

Acts 13: 11  (Paul speaking to the false prophet Bar-Jesus)“Now the hand of the Lord is against you. You are going to be blind, and for a time you will be unable to see the light of the sun." Immediately mist and darkness came over him, and he groped about, seeking someone to lead him by the hand. When the proconsul saw what had happened, he believed, for he was amazed at the teaching about the Lord.

Inducements: cursing someone with blindness prompted the proconsul’s conversion. Hmm, don’t see that one being used much today.

Acts 13: 26, 32-33, 38-41  "Brothers, children of Abraham, and you God-fearing Gentiles, it is to us that this message of salvation has been sent… We tell you the good news: What God promised our fathers he has fulfilled for us, their children, by raising up Jesus… Therefore, my brothers, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. Through him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses. Take care that what the prophets have said does not happen to you: 'Look, you scoffers, wonder and perish, for I am going to do something in your days that you would never believe, even if someone told you.'"

This sermon was being preached to a synagogue crowd, not to a pagan audience, so the hearers already had a lot of theological understanding. The inducements were: message of salvation is given, God’s promises are fulfilled in Jesus’ resurrection, forgiveness of sins, justification through belief, warning to not disregard message at the peril of perishing.

Acts 13: 46  Then Paul and Barnabas answered them boldly: "We had to speak the word of God to you first. Since you reject it and do not consider yourselves worthy of eternal life, we now turn to the Gentiles.”

I include this to be fair, though it technically was not given in the text as an inducement to convert, but only mentioned after the message was rejected. Here we have a mention of eternal life which normal evangelical rendering would automatically equate to heaven. But the text does not use the word heaven, it uses life, and the Greek word is zoe. To equate it to heaven is to shortchange the meaning. Here is Strong’s definition of zoe:

1) life

a) the state of one who is possessed of vitality or is animate

b) every living soul

2) life

a) of the absolute fulness of life, both essential and ethical, which belongs to God, and through him both to the hypostatic "logos" and to Christ in whom the "logos" put on human nature

b) life real and genuine, a life active and vigorous, devoted to God, blessed, in the portion even in this world of those who put their trust in Christ, but after the resurrection to be consummated by new accessions (among them a more perfect body), and to last for ever.

Something akin to heaven is mentioned only in the last part of the last sentence of all the definitions. Zoe life is not primarily about the afterlife, it is about the NOW life.

Acts 14: 3  So Paul and Barnabas spent considerable time there, speaking boldly for the Lord, who confirmed the message of his grace by enabling them to do miraculous signs and wonders.

Inducements: miraculous signs and wonders. Anyone else see a pattern developing here?

Acts 14: 17  Yet he has not left himself without testimony: He has shown kindness by giving you rain from heaven and crops in their seasons; he provides you with plenty of food and fills your hearts with joy.

This word is given to the pagans at Lystra, who were trying to make Paul and Barnabas gods after they had healed a cripple. Nothing deep or theological, Paul merely induces them by pointing out God’s kindnesses, provision and bestowing of joy. And this is to pagans! Those who don’t know Christ yet. Amazing. There’s no “you’re going to hell if you don’t accept Christ.” Nope. Seems a little on the opposite end of the spectrum to me.

Acts 16: 27-31  The jailer woke up, and when he saw the prison doors open, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself because he thought the prisoners had escaped. But Paul shouted, "Don't harm yourself! We are all here!" The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. He then brought them out and asked, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?" They replied, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved--you and your household."

Believe and you will be saved. Again, the text does not explicitly mention heaven or hell. And notice the jailer’s response in verse 34: he was filled with joy because he had come to believe in God--he and his whole family. It wasn’t because he knew he was now going to heaven. His joy came simply from being connected to his Father. He was experiencing that zoe life, real life, right then.

Acts 17: 2-4  As his custom was, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Christ had to suffer and rise from the dead. "This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Christ,” he said. Some of the Jews were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a large number of God-fearing Greeks and not a few prominent women.

The inducements here are using the scriptures to prove that Jesus was the promised Messiah. This would be the so-called “Old Testament” scriptures, of course (I prefer to refer to them as the inspired texts written prior to the advent of Christ). It is interesting the Paul tends to use more reasoning methods in his approach, where the earlier apostles used more signs and wonders. The results of the earlier methods seem to be much more fruitful than simply reasoning.

Acts 17: 31  For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to all men by raising him from the dead.

It is difficult to separate this from the message, but this is only one reference to a final judgment that is given as an inducement to convert. However this text does not hint at eternal punishment as a result of that judgment (i.e., hell).

The rest of Acts contains various instances of Paul persuading/reasoning that Jesus is the Christ and that there was a resurrection from the dead. The text does not indicate the large numbers of converts compared to the earlier conversion experiences in Acts.

Conclusion: The methods of evangelism used in the book of Acts don’t look anything like what is commonly used in the American church today. Nor in my own life, though I’m trying to get there.


Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Surrender Should Not Be an Option

Sep 04, 2007 - 08:15 AM

by Ron Paul

Faced with dwindling support of the Iraq War, the warhawks are redoubling their efforts. They imply we are in Iraq attacking those who attacked us, and yet this is not the case. As we know, Saddam Hussein, though not a particularly savory character, had nothing to do with 9/11. The neo-cons claim surrender should not be an option. In the same breath they claim we were attacked because of our freedoms. Why then, are they so anxious to surrender our freedoms with legislation like the Patriot Act, a repeal of our 4th amendment rights, executive orders, and presidential signing statements? With politicians like these, who needs terrorists? Do they think if we destroy our freedoms for the terrorists they will no longer have a reason to attack us? This seems the epitome of cowardice coming from those who claim a monopoly on patriotic courage.

In any case, we have achieved the goals specified in the initial authorization. Saddam Hussein has been removed. An elected government is now in place in Iraq that meets with US approval. The only weapon of mass destruction in Iraq is our military presence. Why are we still over there? Conventional wisdom would dictate that when the "mission is accomplished", the victor goes home, and that is not considered a retreat.

They claim progress is being made and we are fighting a winnable war, but this is not a view connected with reality. We can't be sure when we kill someone over there if they were truly an insurgent or an innocent Iraqi civilian. There are as many as 650,000 deaths since the war began. The anger we incite by killing innocents creates more new insurgents than our bullets can keep up with. There are no measurable goals to be achieved at this point.

The best congressional leadership can come up with is the concept of strategic redeployment, or moving our troops around, possibly into Saudi Arabia or even, alarmingly enough, into Iran. Rather than ending this war, we could be starting another one.

The American people voted for a humble foreign policy in 2000. They voted for an end to the war in 2006. Instead of recognizing the wisdom and desire of the voters, they are chided as cowards, unwilling to defend themselves. Americans are fiercely willing to defend themselves. However, we have no stomach for indiscriminate bombing in foreign lands when our actual attackers either killed themselves on 9/11 or are still at large somewhere in a country that is neither Iraq nor Iran. Defense of our homeland is one thing. Offensive tactics overseas are quite another. Worse yet, when our newly minted enemies find their way over here, where will our troops be to defend us?

The American people have NOT gotten the government they deserve. They asked for a stronger America and peace through nonintervention, yet we have a government of deceit, inaction and one that puts us in grave danger on the international front. The American People deserve much better than this. They deserve foreign and domestic policy that doesn't require they surrender their liberties.



Next 5 >>